Trading What I See

After a well structured five wave move like we had yesterday, a reversal of some sort is common. Not required, but certainly not a surprise. So when the market created a Spring setup at the open, the first red bar could be an entry for a short sale.

The Russell tried again to break above yesterday’s high, but didn’t exceed the first pivot — the most logical place for a stop. From there the market kept getting weaker all day long.

Since Spring setups can catch a lot of breakout players on the wrong side of the market, you will usually get at least an A-B-C move against the previous trend. After the 8:00 pullback price moved right to the parallel trendline just beyond where “C” would equal 100% of “A.” But then price couldn’t get back to the top of the channel.

Of course you couldn’t predict that in advance, but by the time we had reached the blue “X” on the chart, just by drawing trendlines and their parallels after each new pivot gave you a potential short entry at the top of the new channel. How much of the next move you could capture depends entirely upon your money management technique.

Over the past few weeks I’ve been pointing out Fibonacci external retracement measurements based on the first major pullback in a larger move (marked in white.) I look for reversal points at 127% and 162%. However if we get beyond the 162% level the most common turning point is 262%. As you can see, price didn’t even hesitate at that level.

What comes after 262%? In a runaway move there will often be at least a good bounce at 423%, and many times that will end the move. No — that is not a prediction. And no, I’m not carrying a position overnight. But I’ve already marked the 837.50 level on my trading chart for tomorrow — just in case.

The more you can structure your trading the easier it is to make decisions during the day. I use Fibonacci and trendlines as guides, but in yesterday’s comments John asked an Elliott Wave question. Elliott is another way of adding structure, and in many ways it is similar to what I do. Today the market was kind enough to give me a good example. (Elliott Wave traders — forgive me for some simplification.)

In Elliott Wave theory a strong move usually has three pulses in the direction of a trend (circled waves 1, 3, and 5.) An Elliott rule says that the middle wave (3) cannot be the shortest wave. Another says that wave 4 may not drop below the peak of wave 1 (although this rule is sometimes relaxed in commodities and futures.)

A general Elliott guideline also says that waves 2 and 4 will normally be different in some way — either in the depth of correction or in the number of bars in the wave, and often both are true. If you examine today’s chart you will see that all of these rules and guidelines are met.

Unfortunately, as nicely as this chart matches the rules, I have to agree with Robert Miner — in real time you can only find moves that follow clear Elliott Wave patterns about half the time. That’s why what I look for often resembles Elliott, but doesn’t depend upon complete patterns.

Let’s look at the same chart as I describe it in my commentaries. I expect the first pullback to be relatively large (50% or greater) and the second pullback to be smaller (usually 38%.) [Waves 2 and 4 are usually different.]

In a continuing move, the second rally will usually exceed 162% of the first rally. [Larger third wave.] That’s when I start looking for a third rally after the next pullback. A healthy move will also respect the support of previous pivots. [Wave 4 doesn't enter territory of Wave 1.]

As you can see, there is a lot of similarity between what I do on this blog and Elliott Waves. But when I think in Elliott terms I tend to make predictions, and for me predicting the market often costs me money. So I use Elliott as just another tool — it gives me levels where setups may occur, just like trendlines and general Fibonacci measurements.

For example, at point 4 today we bounced off the pivot support from point 1. Because the second rally had exceeded 162% of the first rally, there was a stronger expectation of more strength ahead. Add in what looks like an Elliott sequence and it just gives more confirmation to the setup.

A basic understanding of Elliott Waves can give you one more profitable way of looking at the market. My favorite EW book is listed below.

---

For More Information:
Robert Prechter’s Elliott Wave Principle

---

fibonacci, fibonacci extension, inside day, reversal

For the third day in a row the first hour range has contained the market’s overall movement. In each case, lacking a good setup during this period I can find no compelling reason for taking a trade.

As you can see from the chart, the Fibonacci measurements are still working even if the market is not going anywhere. There were two A-B-C patterns, each turning at 62%, showing a lack of conviction in either direction.

Sometimes, during periods of indecision, the market will make an early move and then spend the rest of the day oscillating around the center point of that range (blue arrow.) As happened today, that’s where the market will often close.

Boring trading, but remember — when the market puts enough traders to sleep it can suddenly wake them up with a surprise move.

A reader had a question several day’s ago about trading breaks above or below the first hour range. My answer was that if I didn’t already have a trade within the first hour I might not trade at all. Yesterday and today give examples.

Some of the best moves start during the first hour, and I’m always looking for entries. But when I can’t find a setup that I like during this time period, and if the range has been small, I start expecting what happened today — that the first hour range will hold.

Then I confine my search to setups that have two criteria — (1) the setups are very compelling, and (2) if they work they would result in a break outside of this range. It’s surprising how often this will keep me out of positions on a poor trading day.

Yesterday there were no possibilities. Today there was a break through the bottom of the range, but the setup was not strong. For me, both days would allow me to do other research or paperwork.

For those of you that have been following the blog for a while, I’m finally back home (after 2 months.) Everything worked out well, and it’s nice having a multi-monitor setup and time to seriously concentrate on the markets again. Have a great weekend.

Evidently the 127% external retracement was the correct turning point from yesterday’s close. But remember, there were too many other potential reversal levels. If that had happened intraday it was only a trade to consider with extreme caution.

After a gap and a 50% retracement, the market completed a small A-B-C (red) for a Measured Move. The next three hours created a sideways pattern that eventually turned into a rectangle. Although it takes four touches (two on each side) to confirm a rectangle, each touch of the top was on less volume. That’s a strong hint that a consolidation pattern is forming, and a rectangle was a likely possibility starting just after 9:30 (Pacific time.)

Rectangles can go on for a long time, but remember the importance of forgotten trendlines or trendlines drawn from the first small pullback. At the second bottom marked “B” price bounces from that trendline and then makes a volume breakout from the rectangle. The market didn’t even slow down at the rectangle target (width of the pattern), but went to the 100% Measured Move of the larger formation to make the high of the day.

There were three close targets for the high — the yellow parallel (not quite hit), yesterday’s high (green line) and the C=100% blue target. Unlike yesterday’s close, two of the three were exact hits, and the third was close. Certainly a point for partial profits if not a complete exit.

Take a look at the earliest pivot marked “B.” That was certainly a potential entry, and although it’s hard to call it a successful trade, it shouldn’t have been a loser. I’m often an impatient trader, and my exit would have been during the sideways action in the center of the rectangle.

If you had more patience, the false break to a new high should have been an exit. Compare that action to the Spring pattern that often appears on my charts. A break to a new high for any move must have a volume increase to be trustworthy. Any reversal after a low volume breakout should be considered as a potential exit signal.

I’ll be on the road all day tomorrow, so there is the possibility I won’t manage a post in the evening. If not, I should be back on Friday. Good Trading.
Lowell

You’ve probably noticed that I try to point out turns that have multiple indications, since these setups are more likely to work out as expected. If three signals or indicators point to the same result, there could be three times as many other traders pushing price in your direction. Not everyone is looking for the same setups.

Today is an example of multiple versus individual signals. At the bottom marked “A” there were three reasons to expect a reversal at almost exactly the same point. At “B” there were also three potential reversal signals. But at today’s close I can see at least four different levels where a reversal would fit my trading style. And they are not the same.

At “A” we were making a double bottom with the pivot from June 8th. At the same time we finished an external retracement of 162% times the rise to “X.” That is often a Fibonacci turn measurement. And if you’ve learned how to use continuation gaps as a measuring tool, the distance from “X” to the center of the gap was exactly the same as the distance from the center of the gap to “A”. (For a refresher, see Trading Gaps from early April.)

Not only did the center of the gap mark the half-way point — it also provided resistance to the three-bar pullback after the gap. Each of those rising bars had less volume, so just from a chart-reading standpoint the first red bar could be an entry for a short sale.

At point “B” there was a 62% retracement of the entire move down from “X” just as we hit a trendline draw through the first pullback after the top. On June 4th I pointed out how forgotten trendlines drawn across first pullbacks will often mark later reversals — but you will only see them if you leave old trendlines on your charts.

Not shown (except for the Fibonacci level marked at the top) is an internal First Pullback Fib measurement. The top at “B” is at the “normal” 262% external retracement. That makes three reasons to suspect a reversal.

Contrast these pivots with the situation at the close. We have just hit the 127% external retracement of the rise from “A” to “B.” But if we fall a little farther, we’ll get to the yellow parallel. And if that doesn’t hold, there is always the long blue trendline that could turn prices upward. But before we get there it’s always possible that we’ll turn when “C”=100% of “A.”

Waiting for too much confirmation misses trades. But would you rather take a position at “A” and “B”, or take a chance at what will eventually become “C.” As soon as you see a potential setup, start looking for other indications of a turn. On good moves, it’s surprising how often there will be more than one reason to trade.

First Pullback measurements are always external retracements (see yesterday), but they are Fibonacci ratios that few seem to follow. You can mark the Fib levels for the next potential turn as soon a reversal pivot forms following the first significant pullback.

Today each of the major reversals turned at one of these levels (all shown with white lines and arrows.) The 7:30 bottom turned at 127% just as it reached the continuation of a trendline from one of yesterday’s pivots. It also had a Stochastic divergence, and lead to the best move of the day.

That mid-day rally also ended in the same manner, but this time at the 262% external retracement of the first major pullback. This is what I consider a “normal” move. Once again the turn also had confirmation from a trendline at the top of a channel.

After making the high of the day we had another move down. For the third time, the actual reversal near the close was a 262% external retracement of the first good pullback.

This doesn’t work every time, but that’s the case with all support and resistance or Fibonacci levels. They give you an area where turns are more likely to take place. It’s up to your trading plan to give you entries to take advantage of them.