Trading What I See

The market made an immediate reversal just after today’s opening, and declined for the next 30 minutes to the eventual low. Without any pauses there wasn’t much chance for a safe entry. And without any pullbacks there were no internal measurements to pinpoint the bottom.

So even though we turned at a 78% Fibonacci retracement level, by the end of the first hour I had found no tradable setups. That’s when I drew the magenta bars to mark off the first hour’s high and low, and although we broke out of that range there were still no clear entries.

Finally at the pivot marked with a circled “4″ there was a potential entry. As I said yesterday

where there are two pullbacks in a move, the first one will usually be large (most often 62%) and the second one small (38%.)

Of course the movement over the next hour was just sideways so I gave up on the trade. I should have remembered that we are now into the summer trading season where many of the moves seem to happen in slow motion.

During this season it’s often useful to pay more attention to (but not necessarily trade from) the longer term charts because many of the patterns are extended. Even a move from a three to a five minute chart can clarify moves, since you can include more of the previous day’s trading.

By including part of yesterday’s move on this five minute chart you can see the structure of an Elliott impulse wave. If you realize that Wave Four is often a long drawn-out affair, it might increase your patience in this type of a trade. Remember that I don’t actually trade Elliott Waves as such, but much of what I present on this site is derived from Elliott principles.

There’s another reason to illustrate an Elliott Wave today. Last night I received an e-mail from Elliott Wave International. When they found some of my Elliott comments on Trading What I See during a Google search, they asked me to become one of their associates.

Doing so allows me to put up some links (left sidebar) to free information they offer on their site, such as a very nice 10 lesson Elliott Wave tutorial. For those of you interested in Fibonacci and market structure I highly recommend it.

If you follow any of those links, you’ll have to sign up for Club EWI which puts you on their mailing list. Fortunately they don’t send out material excessively. But it’s a no-cost way to learn more about how the market works (at least some of the time.)

Last Tuesday’s commentary left price just under a downtrend line (shown today in yellow) on the 45 minute chart. Since that level had also completed a potential A-B-C with “C” pausing at 62% of “A”, it was looking much like a top.

After pointing that out, my next sentence was “Of course a breakout tomorrow morning would change this pattern …” The magic of Fibonacci and trendlines is how often they work, not that they can predict the market. Part of successful trading is the ability to quickly adapt to new information. On the shortened trading day Wednesday price pushed through both the trendline and the Fib level. But look what happened next.

As soon as price exceeds a pivot point, you want to draw an external retracement measurement to show the 127% and 162% Fib levels. That’s where to start looking for the next potential reversal. And that’s where we closed on the three bars that eSignal shows occurring on the 4th. That doesn’t predict the downturn this morning — it just means it shouldn’t have come as a surprise.

As I have said many times, where there are two pullbacks in a move, the first one will usually be large (most often 62%) and the second one small (38%.) Today the second pullback turned right at the 38% Fibonacci level AND bounced off the support of the broken trendline. An obvious place for a turn.

On my three minute trading chart you can see the market made a nice A-B-C=100% Measured Move that hit the bottom of a parallel channel (in yellow). That gives today’s low two measurements from a 45 minute chart combined with two more from the trading chart. When multiple time frames agree on direction, you have a high probability trade.

Of course there are often more potential Fib and channel trades than I point out (or sometimes even see) that are available during the trading day. In Tuesday’s comments John explains how he used the $Tick reading combined with the magenta channel this morning to execute a nice short sale starting at “X” on the chart. Nice trade, John.

Wedges usually appear during the final surge of a larger move, as a last gasp rally or decline before a reversal. Yesterday’s WEDGE was an exception, since it was pointing against the recent downtrend.

But all the identifying features were there. It made three touches of the bottom trendline and two of the top, creating converging lines. Each of the internal moves can be seen as a small A-B-C. The second major pullback doesn’t find support at the peak of the first wave (overlapping moves.) And volume declines throughout the pattern.

We broke out of the wedge at the open, had a pullback to the rising trendline for a potential entry, and made a relatively fast move to the wedge’s initial target — the very beginning of the pattern.

A wedge will usually reach target in half to three-quarters of the time it took to form. Normally that won’t be the end of the move, but there was a nice divergence (double bottom) warning that at least a strong bounce might occur over the lunch hour.

Like a triangle, a wedge will often reach its target (and sometimes reverse) at the same time the pattern lines cross. That’s certainly a place to take at least partial profits.

The afternoon trading was just a sideways move, perhaps caused by traders unsure of what would happen during the aftermarket rebalancing of the Russell 2000. That’s what caused the spike just after the market closed. It’s interesting that it went just high enough to complete an A-B-C=100% close to the week. Maybe there’s something to this Fibonacci stuff after all.

Evidently the 127% external retracement was the correct turning point from yesterday’s close. But remember, there were too many other potential reversal levels. If that had happened intraday it was only a trade to consider with extreme caution.

After a gap and a 50% retracement, the market completed a small A-B-C (red) for a Measured Move. The next three hours created a sideways pattern that eventually turned into a rectangle. Although it takes four touches (two on each side) to confirm a rectangle, each touch of the top was on less volume. That’s a strong hint that a consolidation pattern is forming, and a rectangle was a likely possibility starting just after 9:30 (Pacific time.)

Rectangles can go on for a long time, but remember the importance of forgotten trendlines or trendlines drawn from the first small pullback. At the second bottom marked “B” price bounces from that trendline and then makes a volume breakout from the rectangle. The market didn’t even slow down at the rectangle target (width of the pattern), but went to the 100% Measured Move of the larger formation to make the high of the day.

There were three close targets for the high — the yellow parallel (not quite hit), yesterday’s high (green line) and the C=100% blue target. Unlike yesterday’s close, two of the three were exact hits, and the third was close. Certainly a point for partial profits if not a complete exit.

Take a look at the earliest pivot marked “B.” That was certainly a potential entry, and although it’s hard to call it a successful trade, it shouldn’t have been a loser. I’m often an impatient trader, and my exit would have been during the sideways action in the center of the rectangle.

If you had more patience, the false break to a new high should have been an exit. Compare that action to the Spring pattern that often appears on my charts. A break to a new high for any move must have a volume increase to be trustworthy. Any reversal after a low volume breakout should be considered as a potential exit signal.

I’ll be on the road all day tomorrow, so there is the possibility I won’t manage a post in the evening. If not, I should be back on Friday. Good Trading.
Lowell

You’ve probably noticed that I try to point out turns that have multiple indications, since these setups are more likely to work out as expected. If three signals or indicators point to the same result, there could be three times as many other traders pushing price in your direction. Not everyone is looking for the same setups.

Today is an example of multiple versus individual signals. At the bottom marked “A” there were three reasons to expect a reversal at almost exactly the same point. At “B” there were also three potential reversal signals. But at today’s close I can see at least four different levels where a reversal would fit my trading style. And they are not the same.

At “A” we were making a double bottom with the pivot from June 8th. At the same time we finished an external retracement of 162% times the rise to “X.” That is often a Fibonacci turn measurement. And if you’ve learned how to use continuation gaps as a measuring tool, the distance from “X” to the center of the gap was exactly the same as the distance from the center of the gap to “A”. (For a refresher, see Trading Gaps from early April.)

Not only did the center of the gap mark the half-way point — it also provided resistance to the three-bar pullback after the gap. Each of those rising bars had less volume, so just from a chart-reading standpoint the first red bar could be an entry for a short sale.

At point “B” there was a 62% retracement of the entire move down from “X” just as we hit a trendline draw through the first pullback after the top. On June 4th I pointed out how forgotten trendlines drawn across first pullbacks will often mark later reversals — but you will only see them if you leave old trendlines on your charts.

Not shown (except for the Fibonacci level marked at the top) is an internal First Pullback Fib measurement. The top at “B” is at the “normal” 262% external retracement. That makes three reasons to suspect a reversal.

Contrast these pivots with the situation at the close. We have just hit the 127% external retracement of the rise from “A” to “B.” But if we fall a little farther, we’ll get to the yellow parallel. And if that doesn’t hold, there is always the long blue trendline that could turn prices upward. But before we get there it’s always possible that we’ll turn when “C”=100% of “A.”

Waiting for too much confirmation misses trades. But would you rather take a position at “A” and “B”, or take a chance at what will eventually become “C.” As soon as you see a potential setup, start looking for other indications of a turn. On good moves, it’s surprising how often there will be more than one reason to trade.

Getting acceptable Fibonacci measurements at futures contract rollover can sometimes be problematic. For longer measurements, do you use the old contract or the new? There is always a gap at rollover, so the measurements won’t be the same.

Yesterday I had a nice 423% external retracement marked on the 15 minute chart for a potential reversal. Today, using the new contract, that measurement is off by about a point and a half. On the 32 point move that was being measured, that comes out to just under five percent.

My solution, for what it’s worth, is to try to base my new contract trading on very short term measurements until the weekend. You decide whether that potential reversal worked or not.

Today we started with a quick double fake-out — up, down, and then the rally. The move created a Spring entry combined with a 127% retracement of the quick upmove. After moving to what would later be labeled “A” there was a 50% pullback which eventually turned into a double bottom.

A trade at the first bottom probably would have been a loss (unless you left your stop below the pivot.) The second bottom (perhaps a re-entry) lead to a nice rally. Both the parallel trendline and the Measured Move pointed out the top at “C.”

Using the “First Pullback” measurement technique that I’ve illustrated several times this week (white lines), today’s top was at a 262% external retracement. The four external retracements I watch for are 127%, 162%, 262%, and 423%.

A fake-out reversal usually comes at 127%. A general reversal zone exists between 127% and 162%. When we pass 162% I watch for a normal move to 262% (as happened today.) And if there is a very strong move, there is often a reversal at 423% as shown yesterday.

Has this move topped? There wasn’t a divergence or a 127% move from the previous peak. But we did turn inside the reversal zone. And we have reached 262%. Not enough agreement to give me any type of bias. As usual, I’ll wait for Monday’s open and see what the charts say then.

If you exclude the gap, there was not much range again today. I’ve seen some studies that tried to say almost all of the gain or loss in the indexes over a long period of time actually occurred overnight, and that for this reason you couldn’t make any money day trading. I guess the bounces that happen intraday don’t count.

Actually today would have been pretty hard to trade, but at least there were some turning points that made sense. As I’ve mentioned often, leave your major trendlines on the charts as long as you can. After today’s large gap, the first move went right to the bottom trendline from yesterday.

We didn’t actually turn there, but the trendline was respected. The sideways movement eventually got to (and slightly through) a parallel, and also tried to form some small channels.

There’s really not much else to point out on this chart, and I’m going to have limited computer access until the end of next week, so some of the commentaries (like tonight) may be a little short. Good trading.